Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Behavior article 2 - TH


Main Body
Dealing with difficult behaviors in the classroom can leave teacher feeling defeated and out of ideas at times. Authors Rappaport and Minahan working together offer some ideas and strategies to help deal with the different kinds of behavior students that are typically found in the classroom. The approach centers around the idea of what they call a FAIR plan. FAIR stands for “F is for understanding the function of the behavior, A is for accommodations, I is for interaction strategies, and R is for responses.” (2012 Minahan & Rappaport). The authors feel that teachers who adopt this plan “can discover that inappropriate behavior is malleable and temporary—and that they can help their students thrive.” (2012 Minahan & Rappaport). In addition, the use of the FAIR strategy has improved behavior of students who were on the verge of being sent out of the district or to isolated classrooms.
Function behavior, the first part of the FAIR acronym, deals with understanding the intent of the behavior. “Behavior analyst Mark Durand outlines four possible functions of behavior: to escape, to obtain a tangible thing, to engage in sensory activities, and to get attention.” (2012 Minahan & Rappaport). The authors also note that the behavioral student may not even be aware of the function. Understanding the function is essential to changing the student behavior.
Escape-motivated behavior occurs when a student attempts to avoid a task, demand, situation, or person.” (2012 Minahan & Rappaport). The author includes examples of this type of behavior such as running out of the classroom or arguing to get out of an activity. Sending the student to the office in this case can often reinforce the behavior as well.
            Sensory behavior is when the student is motivated by sensory input. “Things feel good, look good, taste good, or sound good. Humming loudly while writing, chewing on the end of a pencil, or standing rather than sitting while working are all typical behaviors that fall into this category.” (2012 Minahan & Rappaport). These behaviors tend to disrupt other students and interfere with learning.
Attention-motivated behavior involves the student seeking attention from an adult or peer. Examples include “the student being belligerent, screaming, or continually interrupting the teacher.” (2012 Minahan & Rappaport). The authors note that this can be a positive behavior in an example of a student practicing their reading for teacher praise.
The authors note that negative attention can be better for some students than no attention at all. In addition, the students may know that the negative attention will be quick and predictable unlike positive attention. Some students have learned from home experiences or outside of the home experiences that by acting in an inappropriate manner they can also engage adults.
When behavior incidents do occur, the teacher will document it using an ABC note format. The ABC stands for: “A is for antecedent (what happens immediately before an incident); B is the description of the student's behavior; and C is for consequence (the staff member's or a peer's immediate response to the student's behavior).” (2012 Minahan & Rappaport). This documenting allows for the behaviors to be tracked and also can be analyzed to determine patterns or triggers for student behaviors. In addition, it contributes to a solution to the student behaviors.
When student behaviors are known, the accommodations piece looks to teachers to design or create an accommodation for the student. Interaction strategies deal with the communication between the teacher and the student. Reinforcement of positive behavior and a emphasis on negative tones and messages is key. Response is the final step and it focuses on the teacher response to the student behaviors. The authors note that how a teacher responds has a direct impact on whether the student behavior escalates. The teacher should remain calm and not reinforce the behavior function. Instead of arguing with a student it may be best to redirect them and then to walk away from the student.
The authors conclude that while teachers may feel they cannot control behaviors, using the FAIR strategy they will better understand the student motivations and that the behaviors will diminish as a result.
Conclusion
            I believe the authors present some very valid observations and I also believe that the FAIR strategy is sound in principal. In my classroom I believe I will use many of these strategies to deal with behavioral students. I think it is very key to understand the type of behavior the student is seeking. As the authors state once the motivation is known the instructor can determine the best way to redirect the student.
            I would like to see more overall data on the effectiveness of FAIR. The lack of support data in this article hurts the overall effectiveness of the strategy. I do commend the authors for presenting a number of different strategies to use based on the attention motivations of the student.
           

References

Minahan, J. & Rapparport, N. (2012) Cracking the Behavior Code. Education Leadership, 70(2). Retrieved from: http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/oct12/vol70/num02/Cracking-the-Behavior-Code.aspx

4 comments:

  1. ""Escape-motivated behavior occurs when a student attempts to avoid a task, demand, situation, or person.” (2012 Minahan & Rappaport). The author includes examples of this type of behavior such as running out of the classroom or arguing to get out of an activity. Sending the student to the office in this case can often reinforce the behavior as well."

    I wonder if this is something that has just recently been studied about sending students to the office. It seemed like when I was in school the immediate response of most teachers was to send students to the office. Had I not been through our current class I would have assumed it was a good way to solve a problem, but I am now learning that it can prove to be the opposite! How was the office used when you were in school?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Behavior is always going to be in the clasroom both positive and negative and it's our job to figure out how to manage those behaviors without taking the attention away from the other students. I agree with with what you said Heidi that. I have a particilar student currently who sometimes I send to the office to take a break because he gets overstimulated easily, but have recently started giving him other places in the classroom to take a break so he isn't manipulating going to the office which he has done. Instead of sending your student to the office due to behavioral issues, would you accomodate them with alternative options? Such as a place they could go to in the classroom or have a chair or desk sitting outside the classroom?

    ReplyDelete
  3. The authors using "FAIR" and "ABC" I feel are using a good quick easy way to help a teacher think on the spot. I always think using those methods are very helpful and easy to remember. I feel that I could use both of them, but I feel the "ABC" is a good way to write an after action review.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There are so many different behavior models and ideas it makes your head spin. I think that accommodating a students behavior is tough when there are multiple students involved. How can you accommodate one student when you only have limited time with the students as it is? I agree that you aren't able to necessarily control a students behavior 100% but finding a strategy to help deal with the behavior is a must.

    ReplyDelete